Dziś jest sobota, 24th wrzesień 2022

What Is Mcc Agreement In Nepal

The Americans withdrew angrily, but the damage was done. To be honest, the Indo-Pacific strategy was announced by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in 2018, long after MCC negotiations began in 2012 and the agreement was signed in 2017. Nepal was the first south Asian country to sign the pact after meeting 16 of the 20 policy indicators. Baikuntha Aryal, then Deputy Secretary, and Jonathan Nash, Acting Director General of MCC, signed an agreement in Washington in September 2017 in the presence of Gyandera Bahadur Karki, then Secretary of the Treasury, and US Assistant Secretary of State John J. Sullivan. The U.S. government has agreed to provide $500 million in grants, while Nepal would provide $130 million for the project, which prioritizes energy and roads. This is the largest grant Nepal has ever received. In particular, there are concerns that the MCC agreement could drag Nepal into U.S. competition with China. The US Indo-Pacific Strategic Report of June 1, 2019 makes it very clear that China is a revisionist power and a threat, while Nepal maintains friendly relations with China.

The Nepalese mentality was deeply shaken by the unofficial Indian blockade of 2015. Recognizing the importance of China-related roads and railways, Kathmandu highlights the Belt and Road Initiative in a positive light. However, it is not confirmed whether Nepal would be part of the US military alliance by simply ratifying the MCC and whether it opposes any third country. The pros and cons of MCC could have been discussed before the country accepted it. Most skepticism about MCC seems to be more for domestic consumption than realistic. Nepal must show its intelligence, talents and courage to judge whether or not the MCC is really in the interest of the nation. If there was any doubt about this, why did Nepal sign an agreement with the MCC? The entire phalanx of CN leadership, as well as the NCP leadership who are trying so loudly to end the deal today, was involved in the careful design of the MCC. The agreement has many asymmetrical qualities. Pursuant to Article 7.1, the MCC Agreement takes „precedence over the domestic laws of Nepal”, while Article 5.1(iii) states that MCC funds may not be used to violate U.S. law „or the policy of the United States Government.” But the real controversy is not about the asymmetrical nature of the deal, but about Nepal`s phobia that US aid is part of the Indo-Pacific strategy and can be used for military purposes. .

 Comments are closed.

Main Menu



  • Brak kategorii


  • Facebook